SettingsUnited States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484, was a United States Supreme Court case that held that a complete ban on the advertising of alcohol prices was unconstitutional under the Fi...
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484, was a United States Supreme Court case that held that a complete ban on the advertising of alcohol prices was unconstitutional under the Fi...
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña,, is a United States Supreme Court case which held that racial classifications, imposed by the federal government, must be analyzed under a standard of "st...
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña,, is a United States Supreme Court case which held that racial classifications, imposed by the federal government, must be analyzed under a standard of "st...
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila,, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court limited the scope of the Texas Healthcare Liability Act.
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila,, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court limited the scope of the Texas Healthcare Liability Act.
Apprendi v. New Jersey
Apprendi v. New Jersey ,, was a United States Supreme Court decision.
Apprendi v. New Jersey ,, was a United States Supreme Court decision.
Arizona v. Evans
Arizona v. Evans,, instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrant-less search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of ...
Arizona v. Evans,, instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrant-less search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of ...
Arizona v. Hicks
Arizona v. Hicks,, held that the Fourth Amendment requires the police to have probable cause to seize items in plain view.
Arizona v. Hicks,, held that the Fourth Amendment requires the police to have probable cause to seize items in plain view.
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696 was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously overturned accounting firm Arthur Andersen's conviction of obstructio...
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696 was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously overturned accounting firm Arthur Andersen's conviction of obstructio...
Atkins v. Virginia
Atkins v. Virginia,, is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-3 that executing the mentally retarded violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punish...
Atkins v. Virginia,, is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-3 that executing the mentally retarded violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punish...
Bartnicki v. Vopper
Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001), is a United States Supreme Court case relieving a media defendant of liability for broadcasting a taped conversation of a labor official talking to ...
Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001), is a United States Supreme Court case relieving a media defendant of liability for broadcasting a taped conversation of a labor official talking to ...
Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLC
Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431, is a United States Supreme Court case.
Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431, is a United States Supreme Court case.
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth,, is a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that public universities may subsidize campus groups b...
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth,, is a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that public universities may subsidize campus groups b...
Brogan v. United States
Brogan v. United States, 522 U.S. 398, is a United States Supreme Court case that ruled that the Fifth Amendment does not protect the right of those being questioned by law enforcement offic...
Brogan v. United States, 522 U.S. 398, is a United States Supreme Court case that ruled that the Fifth Amendment does not protect the right of those being questioned by law enforcement offic...
Bush v. Gore
Bush v. Gore,, is the landmark United States Supreme Court decision that effectively resolved the 2000 presidential election in favor of George W. Bush.
Bush v. Gore,, is the landmark United States Supreme Court decision that effectively resolved the 2000 presidential election in favor of George W. Bush.
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, 510 U.S. 569 (1994) was a United States Supreme Court copyright law case that established that a commercial parody can qualify as fair use.
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, 510 U.S. 569 (1994) was a United States Supreme Court copyright law case that established that a commercial parody can qualify as fair use.
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585 (1991), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that United States federal courts will enforce forum selection clau...
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585 (1991), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that United States federal courts will enforce forum selection clau...
Castle Rock v. Gonzales
Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, 7–2, that a town and its police department could not be sued under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for ...
Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, 7–2, that a town and its police department could not be sued under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for ...
Central Green Co. v. United States
Central Green Co. v. United States, 531 U.S. 425 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001.
Central Green Co. v. United States, 531 U.S. 425 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001.
Cheek v. United States
In Cheek v. United States, 498 U.S. 192 (1991), the United States Supreme Court reversed the conviction of John L. Cheek, a tax protester, for willful failure to file tax returns and pay tax.
In Cheek v. United States, 498 U.S. 192 (1991), the United States Supreme Court reversed the conviction of John L. Cheek, a tax protester, for willful failure to file tax returns and pay tax.
Christensen v. Harris County
Christensen v. Harris County, 529 U.S. 576 (2000) is a Supreme Court of the United States case holding that a county's policy of requiring that employees schedule time off so that they do no...
Christensen v. Harris County, 529 U.S. 576 (2000) is a Supreme Court of the United States case holding that a county's policy of requiring that employees schedule time off so that they do no...
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held an ordinance passed in Hialeah, Florida that forbade the "unnece...
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held an ordinance passed in Hialeah, Florida that forbade the "unnece...
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.,, was a United States Supreme Court case.
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.,, was a United States Supreme Court case.
Clinton v. Jones
Clinton v. Jones,, was a landmark United States Supreme Court case establishing that a sitting President of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation against him, for acts ...
Clinton v. Jones,, was a landmark United States Supreme Court case establishing that a sitting President of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation against him, for acts ...
Colorado v. Connelly
Colorado v. Connelly,, was a U.S. Supreme Court case that was initiated by Francis Connelly, who insisted that his schizophrenic episode rendered him incompetent, nullifying his waiver of hi...
Colorado v. Connelly,, was a U.S. Supreme Court case that was initiated by Francis Connelly, who insisted that his schizophrenic episode rendered him incompetent, nullifying his waiver of hi...
Commissioner v. Banaitis
Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), together with Commissioner v. Banaitis, was a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with the issue of whet...
Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), together with Commissioner v. Banaitis, was a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with the issue of whet...
Commissioner v. Banks
Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), together with Commissioner v. Banaitis, was a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with the issue of whet...
Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), together with Commissioner v. Banaitis, was a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with the issue of whet...
Commissioner v. Groetzinger
Commissioner v. Groetzinger, is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which addressed the issue of what qualifies as being either a trade or business under Section 162(a) of...
Commissioner v. Groetzinger, is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which addressed the issue of what qualifies as being either a trade or business under Section 162(a) of...
Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe
Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1 (2003), was a case before the United States Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of the Connecticut sex offender registration ...
Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1 (2003), was a case before the United States Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of the Connecticut sex offender registration ...
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko,, was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the court found that implied damages actions first recognized in Bivens v. Si...
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko,, was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the court found that implied damages actions first recognized in Bivens v. Si...
County of Allegheny v. ACLU
In County of Allegheny v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of two recurring holiday displays located on public property in downtown Pittsburgh.
In County of Allegheny v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of two recurring holiday displays located on public property in downtown Pittsburgh.
County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union
In County of Allegheny v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573, the U.S. Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of two recurring holiday displays located on public property in downtown Pittsburgh.
In County of Allegheny v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573, the U.S. Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of two recurring holiday displays located on public property in downtown Pittsburgh.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case argued on December 6, 1989 and decided on June 25, 1990.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case argued on December 6, 1989 and decided on June 25, 1990.
Cutter v. Wilkinson
Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709, is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court on May 31, 2005, which holds that under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, pris...
Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709, is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court on May 31, 2005, which holds that under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, pris...
Department of Justice v. Landano
Department of Justice v. Landano, 508 U.S. 165 was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States set limits on the federal government's ability to use the exemptions in the Freedom ...
Department of Justice v. Landano, 508 U.S. 165 was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States set limits on the federal government's ability to use the exemptions in the Freedom ...
Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen
Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen, 541 U.S. 752, is a case argued in the Supreme Court of the United States on 21 April 2004.
Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen, 541 U.S. 752, is a case argued in the Supreme Court of the United States on 21 April 2004.
Dickerson v. United States
Dickerson v. United States,, upheld the requirement that the Miranda warning be read to criminal suspects, and struck down a federal statute that purported to overrule Miranda v. Arizona.
Dickerson v. United States,, upheld the requirement that the Miranda warning be read to criminal suspects, and struck down a federal statute that purported to overrule Miranda v. Arizona.
Edward Hanousek, Jr v. United States
Edward Hanousek, Jr v. United States (1996).
Edward Hanousek, Jr v. United States (1996).
Employment Division v. Smith
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that determined that the state could deny unemployment benef...
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that determined that the state could deny unemployment benef...
English v. General Electric
In English v. General Electric Co., 496 U.S. 72 (1990), the United States Supreme Court held that state-law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is not pre-empted by the En...
In English v. General Electric Co., 496 U.S. 72 (1990), the United States Supreme Court held that state-law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is not pre-empted by the En...
Ewing v. California
Ewing v. California,, is one of two cases upholding a sentence imposed under California's three strikes law against a challenge that it constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation ...
Ewing v. California,, is one of two cases upholding a sentence imposed under California's three strikes law against a challenge that it constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation ...
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. 280, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and its relation to preclusion...
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. 280, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and its relation to preclusion...
Florida v. Riley
Florida v. Riley, 488 U.S. 445 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that police officials do not need a warrant to observe an individual's property from public airspace.
Florida v. Riley, 488 U.S. 445 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that police officials do not need a warrant to observe an individual's property from public airspace.
Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.
Friends of the Earth, Inc. et al.
Friends of the Earth, Inc. et al.
Giglio v. United States
Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the prosecution's failure to inform the jury that a witness had been promised not to...
Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the prosecution's failure to inform the jury that a witness had been promised not to...
Godinez v. Moran
Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389 (1993), was a landmark decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that if a defendant was competent to stand trial, they were automatically competent to pl...
Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389 (1993), was a landmark decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that if a defendant was competent to stand trial, they were automatically competent to pl...
Good News Club v. Milford Central School
Good News Club v. Milford Central School,, held that when a government operates a "limited public forum," it may not discriminate against speech that takes place within that forum on the bas...
Good News Club v. Milford Central School,, held that when a government operates a "limited public forum," it may not discriminate against speech that takes place within that forum on the bas...
Griffith v. Kentucky
Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314 (1986), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.
Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314 (1986), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Hazelwood School District et al.
Hazelwood School District et al.
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada,, held that statutes requiring suspects to identify themselves during police investigations did not violate the Fourth Amendment.
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada,, held that statutes requiring suspects to identify themselves during police investigations did not violate the Fourth Amendment.
Hill v. Colorado
Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision.
Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision.
Hodgson v. Minnesota
Hodgson v. Minnesota, 497 U.S. 417 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court abortion rights case that dealt with whether a state law may require notification of both parents before a minor ...
Hodgson v. Minnesota, 497 U.S. 417 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court abortion rights case that dealt with whether a state law may require notification of both parents before a minor ...
Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston
Hurley v. Irish American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston, 515 U.S. 557 (1995), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the right to assemble and...
Hurley v. Irish American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston, 515 U.S. 557 (1995), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the right to assemble and...
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca,, decided that the standard for withholding of removal set in INS v. Stevic,, was too high a standard for applicants for asylum ...
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca,, decided that the standard for withholding of removal set in INS v. Stevic,, was too high a standard for applicants for asylum ...
Kelo v. City of New London
Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another t...
Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another t...
Kyllo v. United States
Kyllo v. United States,, held that the use of a thermal imaging device from a public vantage point to monitor the radiation of heat from a person's home was a "search" within the meaning of ...
Kyllo v. United States,, held that the use of a thermal imaging device from a public vantage point to monitor the radiation of heat from a person's home was a "search" within the meaning of ...
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School DistrictLamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School DistrictLamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District, 508 U.S. 384 (199...
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School DistrictLamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School DistrictLamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District, 508 U.S. 384 (199...
Lawrence v. Texas
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court.
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court.
Lechmere, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Lechmere, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 502 U.S. 527, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States case on union rights and private property rights.
Lechmere, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 502 U.S. 527, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States case on union rights and private property rights.
Leocal v. Ashcroft
Leocal v. Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1 (2004), held that aliens may not be deported after being convicted of DUI if the DUI statute that defines the offense does not contain a mens rea element ...
Leocal v. Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1 (2004), held that aliens may not be deported after being convicted of DUI if the DUI statute that defines the offense does not contain a mens rea element ...
Lockyer v. Andrade
Lockyer v. Andrade,, decided the same day as Ewing v. California, held that there would be no relief by means of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a sentence imposed under Cali...
Lockyer v. Andrade,, decided the same day as Ewing v. California, held that there would be no relief by means of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a sentence imposed under Cali...
Lorillard v. Reilly
Lorillard v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525, was a 2001 case brought on by Lorillard Tobacco Company when a ban on tobacco ads and sales of tobacco within 1,000 feet of schools and playgrounds was imp...
Lorillard v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525, was a 2001 case brought on by Lorillard Tobacco Company when a ban on tobacco ads and sales of tobacco within 1,000 feet of schools and playgrounds was imp...
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife,, was a United States Supreme Court case decided on June 12, 1992, in which the court held that a group of American wildlife conservation and other environment...
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife,, was a United States Supreme Court case decided on June 12, 1992, in which the court held that a group of American wildlife conservation and other environment...
Maryland v. Craig
Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Maryland v. Garrison
Maryland v. Garrison,, is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and the extent of discretion given to police officers acting ...
Maryland v. Garrison,, is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and the extent of discretion given to police officers acting ...
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93, is a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, ...
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93, is a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, ...
McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky
McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky, 545 U.S. 844 (2005), is a case which was argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 2, 2005.
McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky, 545 U.S. 844 (2005), is a case which was argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 2, 2005.
McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union
McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky, 545 U.S. 844 (2005), is a case which was argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 2, 2005.
McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky, 545 U.S. 844 (2005), is a case which was argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 2, 2005.
Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.
Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., 545 U.S. 193 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case with ramifications for patent law.
Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., 545 U.S. 193 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case with ramifications for patent law.
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. 545 U.S. 913 is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court unanimously held that defendant P2P file sharing companies Grokster and Streamca...
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. 545 U.S. 913 is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court unanimously held that defendant P2P file sharing companies Grokster and Streamca...
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case that rejected the argument that a separate opinion privilege existed against libel.
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case that rejected the argument that a separate opinion privilege existed against libel.
Miller-El v. Dretke
Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231, is a United States Supreme Court case that clarified the constitutional limitations on the use by prosecutors of peremptory challenges and of the Texas pro...
Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231, is a United States Supreme Court case that clarified the constitutional limitations on the use by prosecutors of peremptory challenges and of the Texas pro...
Missouri v. Jenkins
Missouri v. Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70 (1995), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.
Missouri v. Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70 (1995), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.
Morrison v. Olson
Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654, was a case that went before the Supreme Court of the United States.
Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654, was a case that went before the Supreme Court of the United States.
National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services
National Cable & Telecommunications Association et al.
National Cable & Telecommunications Association et al.
New York v. United States
New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992) was a decision of the United States Supreme Court.
New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992) was a decision of the United States Supreme Court.
O'Connor v. Ortega
O'Connor v. Ortega,, is a United States Supreme Court decision on the Fourth Amendment rights of government employees with regard to administrative searches in the workplace, during investig...
O'Connor v. Ortega,, is a United States Supreme Court decision on the Fourth Amendment rights of government employees with regard to administrative searches in the workplace, during investig...
O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz
O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342, was a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving the constitutionality of prison regulations.
O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342, was a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving the constitutionality of prison regulations.
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services,, was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services,, was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon
Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon, is a United States Supreme Court decision focused on the aspect of state power and the interpretation of the Com...
Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon, is a United States Supreme Court decision focused on the aspect of state power and the interpretation of the Com...
Perpich v. Department of Defense
Perpich v. Department of Defense, 496 U.S. 334 (1990), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court concerning the Militia Clauses of Article I, Section 8, of the United States Cons...
Perpich v. Department of Defense, 496 U.S. 334 (1990), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court concerning the Militia Clauses of Article I, Section 8, of the United States Cons...
Perry v. Louisiana
Perry v. Louisiana is a case brought before the U.S. Supreme Court over the legality of the forcibly medicating a death row inmate with a mental disorder in order to render him competent to...
Perry v. Louisiana is a case brought before the U.S. Supreme Court over the legality of the forcibly medicating a death row inmate with a mental disorder in order to render him competent to...
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the constitutionality of several Pennsylva...
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the constitutionality of several Pennsylva...
Porter v. Nussle
Porter v. Nussle,, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court settled an intercircuit conflict regarding civil procedure for prisoners seeking redress.
Porter v. Nussle,, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court settled an intercircuit conflict regarding civil procedure for prisoners seeking redress.
Printz v. United States
Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court ruling that established the unconstitutionality of certain interim provisions of the Brady Handgun Violence Pr...
Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court ruling that established the unconstitutionality of certain interim provisions of the Brady Handgun Violence Pr...
Ring v. Arizona
Ring v. Arizona,, is a case in which the United States Supreme Court applied the rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey,, to capital sentencing schemes, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires...
Ring v. Arizona,, is a case in which the United States Supreme Court applied the rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey,, to capital sentencing schemes, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires...
Romer v. Evans
Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620, is a landmark United States Supreme Court case dealing with civil rights and state laws.
Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620, is a landmark United States Supreme Court case dealing with civil rights and state laws.
Rosenberger v. University of Virginia
Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia,, was an opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding whether a state university might, consistent with the Fi...
Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia,, was an opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding whether a state university might, consistent with the Fi...
Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe
Santa Fe Independent School Dist.
Santa Fe Independent School Dist.
Schweiker v. Chilicky
Schweiker v. Chilicky, 487 U.S. 412 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court decision that established limitations on implied causes of action.
Schweiker v. Chilicky, 487 U.S. 412 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court decision that established limitations on implied causes of action.
Shaw v. Reno
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case argued on April 20, 1993.
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case argued on April 20, 1993.
Soldal v. Cook County
Soldal v. Cook County, 506 U.S. 56, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that even absent a search or an arrest, a seizure of property implicates the Fourth Amendment.
Soldal v. Cook County, 506 U.S. 56, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that even absent a search or an arrest, a seizure of property implicates the Fourth Amendment.
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159, was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States interpreting a provision of the Clean Water Act.
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159, was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States interpreting a provision of the Clean Water Act.
South Dakota v. Dole
South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court considered federalism and the power of the United States Congress under the Taxing and Spending...
South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court considered federalism and the power of the United States Congress under the Taxing and Spending...
Tafflin v. Levitt
Tafflin v. Levitt,, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction to decide civil claims brought under the Racketeer Influence...
Tafflin v. Levitt,, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction to decide civil claims brought under the Racketeer Influence...
Tenet v. Doe
Tenet v. Doe, 544 U. S. 1, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled unanimously that spies cannot sue the CIA or the United States government to enforce an espionage c...
Tenet v. Doe, 544 U. S. 1, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled unanimously that spies cannot sue the CIA or the United States government to enforce an espionage c...
Texas v. Johnson
Texas v. Johnson,, was an important decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states.
Texas v. Johnson,, was an important decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states.
U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton
U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that states cannot impose qualifications for prospective members of...
U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that states cannot impose qualifications for prospective members of...
United States v. Alvarez-Machain
United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655, was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the fact of respondent's forcible abduction does not prohibit his trial in ...
United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655, was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the fact of respondent's forcible abduction does not prohibit his trial in ...
United States v. American Library Association
United States v. American Library Association, 539 U.S. 194 (2003), was a decision in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the United States Congress has the authority to require...
United States v. American Library Association, 539 U.S. 194 (2003), was a decision in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the United States Congress has the authority to require...
United States v. Arvizu
United States v. Arvizu,, is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously reaffirmed the proposition that the Fourth Amendment required courts to analyze the reasonable...
United States v. Arvizu,, is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously reaffirmed the proposition that the Fourth Amendment required courts to analyze the reasonable...
United States v. Booker
United States v. Booker,, was a United States Supreme Court decision concerning criminal sentencing.
United States v. Booker,, was a United States Supreme Court decision concerning criminal sentencing.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 was a United States Supreme Court case that invalidated a federal law against flag desecration as violative of free speech under the First Amendment to...
United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 was a United States Supreme Court case that invalidated a federal law against flag desecration as violative of free speech under the First Amendment to...
United States v. Fanfan
In the case of United States v. Fanfan, in 2005 the United States Supreme Court decided that the federal sentencing guidelines which had been in effect for the previous twenty years were unconst...
In the case of United States v. Fanfan, in 2005 the United States Supreme Court decided that the federal sentencing guidelines which had been in effect for the previous twenty years were unconst...
United States v. Lopez
United States v. Alfonso Lopez, Jr., was the first United States Supreme Court case since the New Deal to set limits to Congress's power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Const...
United States v. Alfonso Lopez, Jr., was the first United States Supreme Court case since the New Deal to set limits to Congress's power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Const...
United States v. Morrison
United States v. Morrison, is a United States Supreme Court decision which held that parts of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 were unconstitutional because they exceeded congressiona...
United States v. Morrison, is a United States Supreme Court decision which held that parts of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 were unconstitutional because they exceeded congressiona...
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined that Fourth Amendment protections do not apply to searches and seizures by ...
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined that Fourth Amendment protections do not apply to searches and seizures by ...
United States v. Virginia
United States v. Virginia,, is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States struck down the Virginia Military Institute's long-standing male-only admission policy in a 7-1 decision.
United States v. Virginia,, is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States struck down the Virginia Military Institute's long-standing male-only admission policy in a 7-1 decision.
Vacco v. Quill
Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the right to die.
Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the right to die.
Van Orden v. Perry
Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States of America, involving whether a display of the Ten Commandments on a monument given to th...
Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States of America, involving whether a display of the Ten Commandments on a monument given to th...
Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton
Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, was a U.S. Supreme Court decision which upheld the constitutionality of random drug testing regimen implemented by the local public schools in Vernoni...
Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, was a U.S. Supreme Court decision which upheld the constitutionality of random drug testing regimen implemented by the local public schools in Vernoni...
Virginia v. Maryland
Virginia v. Maryland, 540 U.S. 56 (2003) is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States settled a dispute between the Commonwealth of Virginia and the State of Maryland regarding ...
Virginia v. Maryland, 540 U.S. 56 (2003) is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States settled a dispute between the Commonwealth of Virginia and the State of Maryland regarding ...
Walton v. Arizona
Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 (1990), upheld two important aspects of the capital sentencing scheme in the U.S. state of Arizona — judicial sentencing and the aggravating factor "especial...
Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 (1990), upheld two important aspects of the capital sentencing scheme in the U.S. state of Arizona — judicial sentencing and the aggravating factor "especial...
Washington v. Harper
Washington v. Harper 494 U.S. 210 (1990) is a case in which an incarcerated inmate sued the state of Washington over the issue of involuntary medication, specifically antipsychotic medication.
Washington v. Harper 494 U.S. 210 (1990) is a case in which an incarcerated inmate sued the state of Washington over the issue of involuntary medication, specifically antipsychotic medication.
Waters v. Churchill
Waters v. Churchill, 511 U.S. 661, is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the First Amendment rights of public employees in the workplace.
Waters v. Churchill, 511 U.S. 661, is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the First Amendment rights of public employees in the workplace.
West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy
West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy, was a case before the United States Supreme Court.
West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy, was a case before the United States Supreme Court.
Westside School District v. Mergens
Westside School District v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226, was a case involving a school district's ability to hold classes on Bible study after school.
Westside School District v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226, was a case involving a school district's ability to hold classes on Bible study after school.
Wilkinson v. Austin
Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that while the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment gives rise to a liberty interes...
Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that while the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment gives rise to a liberty interes...