Always private
DuckDuckGo never tracks your searches.
Learn More
You can hide this reminder in Search Settings
All regions
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium (fr)
Belgium (nl)
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada (en)
Canada (fr)
Catalonia
Chile
China
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India (en)
Indonesia (en)
Ireland
Israel (en)
Italy
Japan
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Malaysia (en)
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan (en)
Peru
Philippines (en)
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain (ca)
Spain (es)
Sweden
Switzerland (de)
Switzerland (fr)
Taiwan
Thailand (en)
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
US (English)
US (Spanish)
Vietnam (en)
Safe search: moderate
Strict
Moderate
Off
Any time
Any time
Past day
Past week
Past month
Past year
  1. 1.anagora.org

    📚 node [[2005 09 16 the new feedback will not be controlled]] ... 🔎 full text search for '2005 09 16 the new feedback will not be controlled' pull. This [] took 0.21503210067749023 seconds to render your request on 2024-05-25 04:45:02.582251. An Agora ...
  2. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

    Although one limitation of the current study is that no autonomy or motivation measure was collected regarding choice over one's KR schedule 2, support for our assumption comes from recent work by Ste-Marie et al. (2013) who found learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules despite participants in the self-controlled and yoked ...
  3. Was this helpful?
  4. researchgate.net

    A second perspective takes an information processing view and suggests that self-controlled feedback advantages are due to participants being able to 3 subjectively evaluate one's recently ...
  5. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

    The study follows up on the contention that self-controlled feedback schedules benefit learning because they are more tailored to the performers' needs than externally controlled feedback schedules (Chiviacowsky & Wulf, 2002). ... 2005 Mar;76(1):42-8. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599260. Authors Suzete Chiviacowsky 1 , Gabriele Wulf ...
  6. semanticscholar.org

    Here, we revisited Chiviacowsky and Wulf's (2005) design to investigate the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules. We replicated their Self-Before and Self-After groups, but added a Self-Both group that was able to request feedback before a trial, but could then change or stay with their original choice after the trial.
  7. frontiersin.org

    ted control over their feedback schedule on a trial-to-trial basis (hereafter termed self-controlled) relative to externally imposed feedback schedules (hereafter termed yoked;see Wulf,2007;Sanli etal., 2013 for reviews). In this context, feedback refers to infor-mation that may not normally be available to the learner [i.e.,
  8. gwulf.faculty.unlv.edu

    Self-control group Number of responses 1. 2. When/why did you ask for feedback? a. ( ) mostly after you thought you had a good trial b. ( ) mostly after you thought you had a bad trial c. ( ) after good or bad trials equally d. ( ) randomly e. ( ) none of the previous ones. When did you NOT ask for feedback: a. ( ) after good trials b ...
  9. psycnet.apa.org

    The learning advantages of self-controlled feedback schedules compared to yoked schedules have been attributed to motivational influences and/or information processing activities with many researchers adopting the motivational perspective in recent years. Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005) found that feedback decisions made before (Self-Before) or after a trial (Self-After) resulted in similar ...
  10. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

    National Center for Biotechnology Information

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articles › PMC3431613

    This dilemma does not, however, undermine the importance of the current demonstration that the less active participants reported asking for feedback after "good" trials, were able to identify these trials, and ultimately benefited from self-controlled feedback. Thus, the current results support the idea that self-controlled feedback effects ...
  11. gwulf.faculty.unlv.edu

    16 — 14 12 10 Ret Tm Blocks of 10 trials Figure 2. Relative-timing errors (and standard errors) for the self- before and self-after groups during practice, retention, and transfer. 600 500 e 400 g 300 200 < 100 Ret Trn Blocks of 10 trials Figure 3. Absolute-timing errors (and standard errors) for the self-

    Can’t find what you’re looking for?

    Help us improve DuckDuckGo searches with your feedback

Custom date rangeX