Always private
DuckDuckGo never tracks your searches.
Learn More
You can hide this reminder in Search Settings
All regions
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium (fr)
Belgium (nl)
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada (en)
Canada (fr)
Catalonia
Chile
China
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India (en)
Indonesia (en)
Ireland
Israel (en)
Italy
Japan
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Malaysia (en)
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan (en)
Peru
Philippines (en)
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain (ca)
Spain (es)
Sweden
Switzerland (de)
Switzerland (fr)
Taiwan
Thailand (en)
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
US (English)
US (Spanish)
Vietnam (en)
Safe search: moderate
Strict
Moderate
Off
Any time
Any time
Past day
Past week
Past month
Past year
  1. people.duke.edu

    measures of network isolation. Still, the pro-portion of respondents who appear friendless, and the trends in these proportions, can provide a cross-check on the 2004 Numgiven measure. (1) Social Evenings: The GSS has long asked interviewees how often they Òspend a social eveningÓ with relatives, neighbors, or friends outside the neighborhood.
  2. journals.sagepub.com

    McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Brashears (2006, 2008b) reported that Americans' social networks shrank precipitously from 1985 to 2004. When asked to list the people with whom they discussed "important matters," respondents to the 2004 General Social Survey (GSS) provided about one-third fewer names than did respondents in the 1985 survey.
    Author:Claude S. FischerPublished:2009
  3. psycnet.apa.org

    The article presents a narrative review of scholarship on social support through social networking sites (SNSs) published from 2004 to 2015. By searching keywords related to social support and SNSs in major databases for social sciences, we identified and content analyzed directly relevant articles (N = 88). The article summarizes the prevalence of theory usage; the function of theory usage (e ...
  4. sciencedirect.com

    Table 1 shows all relevant whole network correlations and descriptive statistics. Hypothesis 1 proposed a positive relationship between power and accuracy for negative affective (dislike) ties. Results demonstrate a positive, significant coefficient for dislike network accuracy and formal power (Table 2: b = 0.04, t = 2.06, p < .05), suggesting that managers were generally more accurate than ...
  5. psycnet.apa.org

    M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and M. Brashears (2006, 2008b; see record 2006-08930-001) reported that Americans' social networks shrank precipitously from 1985 to 2004. When asked to list the people with whom they discussed "important matters," respondents to the 2004 General Social Survey (GSS) provided about one-third fewer names than did respondents in the 1985 survey. Critically, the ...
  6. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

    The way in which many people use social media—for example, scrolling quickly through a large number of posts, consuming news intermixed with content for which accuracy is not relevant (e.g., family photos, cat videos, etc.), using social media as a way to relax and unwind rather than think critically—is not conducive to thinking carefully ...
  7. Can’t find what you’re looking for?

    Help us improve DuckDuckGo searches with your feedback

Custom date rangeX