Always private
DuckDuckGo never tracks your searches.
Learn More
You can hide this reminder in Search Settings
All regions
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium (fr)
Belgium (nl)
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada (en)
Canada (fr)
Catalonia
Chile
China
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India (en)
Indonesia (en)
Ireland
Israel (en)
Italy
Japan
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Malaysia (en)
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan (en)
Peru
Philippines (en)
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain (ca)
Spain (es)
Sweden
Switzerland (de)
Switzerland (fr)
Taiwan
Thailand (en)
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
US (English)
US (Spanish)
Vietnam (en)
Safe search: moderate
Strict
Moderate
Off
Any time
Any time
Past day
Past week
Past month
Past year
  1. math.stackexchange.com

    Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.. Visit Stack Exchange
  2. math.ucdavis.edu

    De nition 8.3 An orthogonal projection on a Hilbert space H is a linear map P : H ! H that satis es P2 = P; hPx;yi = hx;Pyi for all x;y 2 H: An orthogonal projection is necessarily bounded. Proposition 8.4 If P is a nonzero orthogonal projection, then kPk = 1. Proof. If x 2 H and Px 6= 0, then the use of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality implies ...
  3. math.stackexchange.com

    Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site
  4. math.mit.edu

    qforsome p ¡n. Then,thereexistsafunction u PC0; p qwith 1 n p such that u u almost everywhere and the following holds}u } C0; p q⁄C}u} W1;pp q for some constantC depending on p, n, and . Corollary 6. Every bounded sequence tu ku•H1 0 p qhas a subsequence tu k m usuch that u k m Æu in H¯ 1 0 p q; u k m Ñu in L¯ 2p q; for some u¯ PH1 0 p q.
  5. math.lsu.edu

    an element of order p. Proof. Write m = pn. The proof is by induction on n. If n = 1 then jGj = p and G is cyclic of prime order p. In this case any nonidentity element of G has order p. Now suppose that n > 1 and that any abelian group G0 with jG0j = pn0 for n0 < n has an element of order p. Let H be a maximal subgroup of G. If p divides jHj ...
  6. www2.isye.gatech.edu

    H 2n ≥ 1+ n 2, whenever n is a nonnegative integer. From Rosen, 4th ed, pg. 193 Notice that this only applies to harmonic numbers at powers of 2. Proof To carry out the proof, let P(n) be the proposition that H 2n ≥ 1+ n 2. Basis Step Let n = 0. Then P(0) is H 20 = H 1 = 1 ≥ 1+ 0 2. Inductive Step Assume that P(n) is true, so that H 2n ...
  7. people.math.wisc.edu

    0 (u;v) H1 0 = hg;vi The right-hand side de nes a bounded linear functional on H1 0 (), because, by de nition hg;vi kgk H1kvk 01 for all v2H1 0. Every bounded linear functional on a Hilbert space such as H1() is of the form v7!(u;v) H1 0 for one and only one u2H1 0. QED 4.4. Theorem. If u2H1 0 is the solution to u= gwith g2H 1(), then kuk H 1 0 ...
  8. people.stat.sc.edu

    0, so that smaller values of Y below1=p 0 make the likelihood ratio smaller. In light of this fact, there is some c 1 such that the test Reject H 0 iff Y <c 1 is equivalent to the likelihood ratio test. The size of the test is given by sup p p 0 P p(Y <c 1) = P p 0 (Y <c 1); so we may choose c 1 to be the lower quantile of theGeometric(p 0 ...
  9. 0 . and H. 1 . do not play a symmetric role: the data is is only used to try to disprove H. 0 In particular lack of evidence, does not mean that H. 0 . is true ("innocent until proven guilty") A test is a statistic ψ ∈ {0, 1} such that: If ψ = 0, H. 0. is not rejected; If ψ = 1, H. 0. is rejected. Coin example: H. 0: p = 1/2 vs. H

    Can’t find what you’re looking for?

    Help us improve DuckDuckGo searches with your feedback

  1. mathbb P^n,T _{ mathbb P^n}

    As pointed out by Mariano Suárez-Álvarez in the comments, we have

    $$H^1(\mathbb{P}^n, \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^n}(1)^{n+1}) = H^1(\mathbb{P}^n, \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^n}(1))^{n+1}.$$

    Now note that

    $$H^1(\mathbb{P}^n, \mathcal{O}(1)) \cong H^1(\mathbb{P}^n, \mathcal{O}(-n-1)\otimes\mathcal{O}(n+2)) \cong H^1(\mathbb{P}^n, K_{\mathbb{P}^n}\otimes\mathcal{O}(n+2)).$$

    As $\mathcal{O}(n+2)$ is ample, we see that $H^1(\mathbb{P}^n, \mathcal{O}(1)) = 0$ by the Kodaira vanishing theorem. Therefore

    $$H^1(\mathbb{P}^n, T_{\mathbb{P}^n}) \cong H^2(\mathbb{P}^n, \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^n}) = 0.$$

    --Michael Albanese

    Was this helpful?
Custom date rangeX