Always private
DuckDuckGo never tracks your searches.
Learn More
You can hide this reminder in Search Settings
All regions
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium (fr)
Belgium (nl)
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada (en)
Canada (fr)
Catalonia
Chile
China
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India (en)
Indonesia (en)
Ireland
Israel (en)
Italy
Japan
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Malaysia (en)
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan (en)
Peru
Philippines (en)
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain (ca)
Spain (es)
Sweden
Switzerland (de)
Switzerland (fr)
Taiwan
Thailand (en)
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
US (English)
US (Spanish)
Vietnam (en)
Safe search: moderate
Strict
Moderate
Off
Any time
Any time
Past day
Past week
Past month
Past year
  1. Only showing results from www.theregreview.org

    Clear filter to show all search results

  2. theregreview.org

    The third edition of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's (OECD) Regulatory Policy Outlookcentrally focuses on ensuring that policymakers build policy on a sound evidentiary basis. OECD's 2012 Recommendation on Regulatory Policy and Governance reflects the general agreement across OECD member countries of the importance of evidence-based policies.
  3. theregreview.org

    Ultimately, public input will enable Congress to pass more inclusive, equitable, and effective laws. As the people's branch, Congress should have a more democratic and open lawmaking process that makes it easy for all individuals—including those who are most marginalized—to have their voices heard.
  4. theregreview.org

    The quality of public input on proposed rules ultimately depends on agencies informing the public of a realistic range of alternative options. Christopher Carrigan is an associate professor at the George Washington University Trachtenberg School of Public Policy and Public Administration and a co-director of the GW Regulatory Studies Center.
  5. theregreview.org

    Any discussion of public input in notice and comment rulemaking should start with section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, which is fairly simple and straightforward: agencies are to provide notice of what they intend to do—which is only fair to those affected—and afford interested persons an opportunity to comment, which makes ...
  6. theregreview.org

    In a recent paper, my co-authors and I demonstrated the feasibility of using NLP techniques to help create clusters of stakeholder groups in consultation processes based on semantics—that is, the way that groups understand and use key words and expressions related to a given policy. We term this process "language-based stakeholders ...
  7. theregreview.org

    Falsely generating comments to influence public policy is an old political game. Even in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, the Roman senator Cassius makes an attempt to convince Brutus of the public's support by faking letters "in several hands … as if they came from several citizens.". The question today is how to handle such an old political game when new digital tools are at play.
  8. theregreview.org

    A recent panel hosted by the Administrative Conference of the United States explored reforms to improve public participation in the rulemaking process. One topic was how to increase the number and expand the type of commenters in a given rulemaking.. That topic, of course, raises competing concerns about mass comments and the workload associated with the occasional rulemaking docket that ...
  9. theregreview.org

    These new recommendations provide guidance on how agencies can improve their management of mass and computer-generated comments on proposed rules, enhance the periodic retrospective review of regulations, expand the early involvement of rulemaking experts, and make more reliable use of virtual methods to conduct adjudicatory hearings.
  10. theregreview.org

    Rigorous policy evaluation often involves randomization, and both federal and state governments have used randomization for a variety of purposes for approximately two centuries. But in the particular context of random government audits, transparency of process is crucial—especially when non-compliance can have reputational effects.
  11. theregreview.org

    Informal rulemaking itself was a novel approach to policymaking at the time, as many agencies previously had produced policy iteratively through decisions issued in individual cases. And the idea of allowing interested stakeholders to offer input to the agency that it was legally obligated to consider was perhaps the most unique feature of this ...

    Can’t find what you’re looking for?

    Help us improve DuckDuckGo searches with your feedback

Custom date rangeX