Always private
DuckDuckGo never tracks your searches.
Learn More
You can hide this reminder in Search Settings
All regions
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium (fr)
Belgium (nl)
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada (en)
Canada (fr)
Catalonia
Chile
China
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India (en)
Indonesia (en)
Ireland
Israel (en)
Italy
Japan
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Malaysia (en)
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan (en)
Peru
Philippines (en)
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain (ca)
Spain (es)
Sweden
Switzerland (de)
Switzerland (fr)
Taiwan
Thailand (en)
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
US (English)
US (Spanish)
Vietnam (en)
Safe search: moderate
Strict
Moderate
Off
Any time
Any time
Past day
Past week
Past month
Past year
  1. americanbar.org

    (ii) negotiate for private employment with any person who is involved as a party or as lawyer for a party in a matter in which the lawyer is participating personally and substantially, except that a lawyer serving as a law clerk to a judge, other adjudicative officer or arbitrator may negotiate for private employment as permitted by Rule 1.12(b ...
    • Rule 1.11 Special Conflicts of Interest For Former And Current ...

      The question of whether two government agencies should be regarded as the same or different clients for conflict of interest purposes is beyond the scope of these Rules. See Rule 1.13 Comment [9]. [6] Paragraphs (b) and (c) contemplate a screening arrangement. See Rule 1.0(k) (requirements for screening procedures).

    • Model Rule 1.11 - American Bar Association

      (Conflicts are not imputed under either the current or the proposed Rule when the move is from one government agency to another.) 7. Paragraph (b): Add scienter requirement. This change conforms this Rule to Rule 1.10, in which associated lawyers are not subject to discipline unless they "know" of the disqualification of their colleague. 8.

  2. americanbar.org

    The question of whether two government agencies should be regarded as the same or different clients for conflict of interest purposes is beyond the scope of these Rules. See Rule 1.13 Comment [9]. [6] Paragraphs (b) and (c) contemplate a screening arrangement. See Rule 1.0(k) (requirements for screening procedures).
  3. americanbar.org

    (Conflicts are not imputed under either the current or the proposed Rule when the move is from one government agency to another.) 7. Paragraph (b): Add scienter requirement. This change conforms this Rule to Rule 1.10, in which associated lawyers are not subject to discipline unless they "know" of the disqualification of their colleague. 8.
  4. Was this helpful?
  5. calbar.ca.gov

    that each provision that corresponds to a concept in Model Rule 1.8 be assigned a separate rule number as is done in the current California rules. For example, the proposed rule corresponding to Model Rule 1.8(a) is numbered 1.8.1; the rule corresponding to Model Rule 1.8(b) is numbered 1.8.2, and so forth.
  6. downeylawgroup.com

    ABA Model Rules—Model Rules 1.10, 1.11, 1.12 and 1.18—are: * when the conflict arises from prior work performed by a nonlawyer, Rule 1.10 cmt. [4]; * when the conflict arises from prior work by a lawyer who was a government lawyer when the work was performed, Rule 1.11; * when the conflict arises from prior ...
  7. Sep 20, 2024ABA Model Rule 1.10(e) ("The disqualification of lawyers associated in a firm with former or current government lawyers is governed by Rule 1.11."); ABA Model Rule 1.11, Cmt. [2] ("Because of the special problems raised by imputation within a government agency, paragraph (d) [of Rule 1.11, which addresses conflicts of a current government ...
  8. lalegalethics.org

    This rule regulates the special conflicts of interest for lawyers who are former or current government officers or employees. It is identical to ABA Model Rule 1.11, which was revised in 2002 and 2013.
  9. courts.nh.gov

    New Hampshire reordered the language in ABA Model Rule 1.11(e)(1) to clarify that the term "matters covers only proceedings, judicial or otherwise, involving specific parties and not general proceedings such as rulemaking or regulation. 2. In determining whether a lawyer is subject to the prohibition under section (d), a number of factors ...
  10. casetext.com

    Sep 26, 2024Read Rule 1.11 - Special Conflicts Of Interest For Former And Current Government Officers And Employees, Va. R. Sup. Ct. 1.11, ... The Committee believed that the ABA Model Rule provides more complete guidance regarding lawyers' movement between the public and private sectors. However, the Committee added the language of DR 8-101(A) as ...
  11. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company

    https://www.mlmins.com › Library › Conflicts Guide.pdf

    Rule 1.8 conflicts could be considered under ABA Rule 1.7(a)(2), as types of "materially limited representation" conflicts. ABA Rules 1.8(b) and 1.9(c)(1) both deal with misuse of client information. • ABA Rule 1.9 governs former client conflicts. • ABA Rule 1.10 and Other Imputation RulesABA Rule 1.10 imputes throughout private
  12. Can’t find what you’re looking for?

    Help us improve DuckDuckGo searches with your feedback

Custom date rangeX